Perception versus reality: A case-matched study assessing the intraoperative hemodynamics of minimally invasive retroperitoneal versus transperitoneal approach to pheochromocytomas.

BACKGROUND: Pheochromocytomas produce excess catecholamines that can result in intraoperative hemodynamic instability. Centers have reported variations in intraoperative hemodynamics with the retroperitoneoscopic versus the laparoscopic transperitoneal approach to adrenalectomies. When the retroperitoneoscopic approach was initiated for pheochromocytomas at our institution, the perception was of improved intraoperative hemodynamics, hypothesizing that increased retroperitoneoscopic insufflation pressures caused decreased venous return and less fluctuation in circulating catecholamines. The purpose of this study was to examine if a difference in intraoperative hemodynamics exists between a size-matched cohort of laparoscopic transperitoneal and retroperitoneoscopic pheochromocytoma patients. METHODS: Unilateral adrenalectomies for pheochromocytoma performed via laparoscopic transperitoneal or retroperitoneoscopic approaches from 2015 to 2021 were identified from a surgical database. As larger tumors often underwent a laparoscopic transperitoneal approach, cases were matched 1:1 by tumor size. All patients received phenoxybenzamine. Groups were compared by patient characteristics, preoperative blockade, intraoperative hemodynamics and management, and early postoperative outcomes. RESULTS: There were 13 laparoscopic transperitoneal adrenalectomy cases matched to 13 retroperitoneoscopic cases according to tumor size. Both groups (laparoscopic transperitoneal and retroperitoneoscopic) were similar for age (53 years), body mass index (28.5 vs 29.7), sex (69% female), and side (8 vs 7 right). There was no difference in preoperative 24-hour urine metanephrines/normetanephrines (9.9/8.0 vs 2.4/5.7 µmol/day). The phenoxybenzamine dose was similar in both groups (112 vs 114 mg/24 hours), as were baseline heart rate, blood pressure, and mean arterial pressure. There was no difference in any intraoperative hemodynamic parameters or vasoactive interventions. Operative time, length of stay, and 30-day emergency visits were similar between groups. CONCLUSION: This matched cohort study did not find a difference in intraoperative hemodynamics between laparoscopic transperitoneal and retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy approaches for pheochromocytoma in appropriately selected and blocked patients.

Strategies for intraoperative glucose management: a scoping review.

PURPOSE: Perioperative hyperglycemia is associated with adverse outcomes for patients with and without diabetes. Guidelines and published protocols for intraoperative glycemic management have substantial variation in their recommendations. We sought to characterize the current evidence-guiding intraoperative glycemic management in a scoping review. SOURCES: Our search strategy included MEDLINE (Ovid and EBSCO), PubMed, PubMed Central, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, SciVerse Scopus, and Web of Science and a gray literature search of Google, Google Scholar, hand searching of the reference lists of included articles, OAISter, institutional protocols, and ClinicalTrails.gov. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We identified 41 articles that met our inclusion criteria, 24 of which were original research studies. Outcomes and exposures were defined heterogeneously across studies, which limited comparison and synthesis. Investigators often created arbitrary and differing categories of glucose values rather than analyzing glucose as a continuous variable, which limited our ability to combine results from different studies. In addition, the study populations and surgery types also varied considerably, with few studies performed during day surgeries and specific surgical disciplines. Study populations often included more than one type of surgery, indication, and urgency that were expected to have varying physiologic and inflammatory responses. Combining low- and high-risk patients in the same study population may obscure the harms or benefits of intraoperative glycemic management for high-risk procedures or patients. CONCLUSION: Future studies examining intraoperative glycemic management should carefully consider the study population, surgical characteristics, and pre- and postoperative management of hyperglycemia.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: L'hyperglycémie périopératoire est associée à des effets indésirables chez les patients diabétiques et non diabétiques. Les lignes directrices et les protocoles publiés pour la prise en charge glycémique peropératoire présentent des variations substantielles dans leurs recommandations. Nous avons cherché à caractériser les données probantes actuelles guidant la prise en charge glycémique peropératoire dans une étude de portée. SOURCES: Notre stratégie de recherche a inclus les bases de données MEDLINE (Ovid et EBSCO), PubMed, PubMed Central, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, SciVerse Scopus et Web of Science, ainsi qu'une recherche documentaire grise sur Google, Google Scholar, la recherche manuelle des listes de référence des articles inclus, OAISter, les protocoles institutionnels et ClinicalTrials.gov. CONSTATATIONS PRINCIPALES: Nous avons identifié 41 articles qui répondaient à nos critères d'inclusion, dont 24 étaient des études de recherche originales. Les critères d'évaluation et les expositions étaient définis de manière hétérogène d'une étude à l'autre, ce qui a limité la comparaison et la synthèse. Les chercheurs ont souvent créé des catégories arbitraires et différentes de valeurs glycémiques plutôt que d'analyser la glycémie comme une variable continue, ce qui a limité notre capacité à combiner les résultats de différentes études. En outre, les populations étudiées et les types de chirurgie variaient également considérablement, avec peu d'études réalisées lors de chirurgies ambulatoires et dans certaines disciplines chirurgicales spécifiques. Les populations étudiées comprenaient souvent plus d'un type de chirurgie, d'indication et d'urgence, pour lesquelles des réponses physiologiques et inflammatoires variables étaient attendues. La combinaison de patients à faible et à haut risque dans la même population d'étude a pu masquer les inconvénients ou les avantages d'une prise en charge glycémique peropératoire pour les interventions ou les patients à haut risque. CONCLUSION: Les études futures portant sur la prise en charge glycémique peropératoire devraient examiner attentivement la population étudiée, les caractéristiques chirurgicales et la prise en charge pré- et postopératoire de l'hyperglycémie.

Transesophageal Echocardiography-Guided Ventriculoatrial Shunt Insertion.

BACKGROUND: Determining an optimal location within the right atrium (RA) for placement of the distal ventriculoatrial (VA) shunt catheter offer several operative challenges that place patients at risk for perioperative complications and downstream VA shunt failure. Utilizing transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) guidance to place distal VA shunt catheters may help to circumvent these risks. OBJECTIVE: To review our current practice of VA shunt insertion using TEE guidance. METHODS: A retrospective review of all consecutive patients who underwent VA shunt procedures between December 19, 2016 and January 22, 2019, during which time intraoperative TEE was used for shunt placement was performed. Data on the time required for shunt placement and total procedure time, baseline echocardiography findings, and short- and long-term complications of shunt placement were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 33 patients underwent VA shunt procedures, with a median follow-up time of 250 (88-412) d. The only immediate complication related to shunt placement or TEE use was transient ectopy in 1 patient. The mean time for atrial catheter insertion was 12.6 ± 4.8 min. Right-heart catheters were inserted between the RA-superior vena cava junction and 22 mm within the RA in all but 3 procedures. A total of 7/33 patients (21%) underwent shunt revision. Indications for revisions included distal clots, proximal obstruction, positive blood culture, and shunt valve revision. No other complications of VA shunt insertion were reported. CONCLUSION: VA shunt insertion using TEE allows for precise distal catheter placement. Early patient experience confirms this technique has a low complication rate.